Minimalism (squeek-wise)

Stuff

Semantic Minimalism

http://woa04.unito.it/materiale/AOSE.pdf There has been some debate On what an agent is, and what could be appropriately called an agent Two main viepoints ?? The (strong) artificial intelligence viewpoint An agent must be, proactive, intelligent, and it must conversate instead of doing client-server computing ?? The (weak) software engineering viewpoint An agent is a software component with internal (either reactive or proactive) threads of execution, and that can be engaged in complex and stateful interactions protocols Stuff painterly --------> the <----------------- minimalism cloud I think that Greenberg (even without knowing it) was full-filling the "commentation/explanation/non-it-documentation) similar to Breton (surrealists) and ??? (dada). Note the way that "success has many fathers" (an old Chinese saying) and how later they changed the same-old "he said, i sed" story as to who did what. Look as well as at things like Breton's exclusion of Dali being parallel to Greenberg's exclusion of Frank Stella, ... ?others? On the one hand accepting into the fold Pollock. So, let;s boil it all down: Clearly several var's on sev lev's are operating: Pollock @has@ trad studio skills (esp draftmanship) @studied-with@ Benton @who-is-was@ AN AMERICAN STANDARD (read this as @is-salon-approved@) Modern art must necessarily reflect modern times ref to Bruno Latour's "We have never been modern" Thus, we have a simple equation complex, intricate Odd, new artist + and NON-random (modern times) style ---------> valid new path for art @gives@ While things like Stella (no matter how clearly expressed: "there's nothing there but paint and canvas" @which-may-be@ "a put on" (ie, false front, bravado, double-speek, etc) In a similar fashion that so many jazzists refer back to Bach (quite aside from the rather bourgeouise (Russian: Proshlohst - self-satisfied mediocrity of the middle class) view that ONLY BACCCHHHH is TREU MUSIC), since he was the first (via such as "The Well Tempered Clavier" - read this as "all possible notes and tonalities in all possible combinations" or as vis artists we would say, iconoplexically: scientist x jazzist (sound, variations) XLATE into artist ( domains-are_____ ) --> the colour wheel More formally we might write: scientist [ @a-key-is@ : SOUND ] x jazzist [ @a-key-is@ : MUSICAL-OBJECTS ] Let (in this case) MUSICAL-OBJECTS be a non-empty set formed from searches of the form: fractal-explosion (scales) ---> the colour wheel x jazzist [ @a-key-is@ : MUSICAL-OBJECTS ] Let (in this case) MUSICAL-OBJECTS be a non-empty set formed from searches of the form: fractal-explosion (scales) ---> the colour wheel Where i (not more than a bit un-certainly) assert that jazzist (fractal-explosion) operating on @music scales@ @can-be-reverse-engineered@ @to yield@ Bach's